Those who were with him on Oct 11 say that Mam Sonando, owner and director of Beehive 105 FM Radio, knew he was going to be arrested.
A defamation lawsuit had been filed against him on behalf of Prime Minister Hun Sen and police had surrounded his home overnight. By the time Mam Sonando left his home in Kien Svay district, Kandal province, early the next morning, police were ready.
Flanked by officers at Phnom Penh Municipal Court, Mam Sonando was charged under criminal law with defaming Prime Minister Hun Sen, rather than under the press law, in which defamation is a common misdemeanor.
But for journalists to face charges of criminal defamation under the anachronistic UNTAC laws of the early 1990s is par for the course, if past defamation cases against journalists are an indication.
When Mam Sonando was imprisoned under pre-trial detention, the government defended his treatment, saying the radio station owner had not fulfilled his journalistic obligations and had not properly balanced an interview that was critical of Hun Sen’s record on border issues.
“He did not ask for the government’s side,” Information Minister Khieu Kanharith said Tuesday. “This is the ABCs of journalism.”
In jailing Mam Sonando, the government did not attack freedom of expression, Khieu Kanharith said. “Journalists cannot be above the law,” he said.
“I don’t want to see any journalists in jail,” he added, “but I want them to be professional.”
According to Sok Sam Oeun, executive director of the Cambodian Defenders Project, only two journalists have been jailed in Cambodia since 1993 after being convicted of defamation.
In late 1994, the opposition newspaper Voice of Khmer Youth ran an opinion piece entitled, “Ranariddh is More Stupid than Hun Sen Three Times a Day.” The Ministry of Information acted quickly, charging the paper’s editor, Yim Sokha, with defamation under the UNTAC laws.
In February 1995, the municipal court sentenced him to one year in jail, the first time a journalist had been sentenced to prison for defamation under the law.
A short time later, Hen Vipheak, editor of the opposition paper New Liberty News, was also charged with defamation and handed the same sentence.
There was no press law at the time that Yim Sokha and Hen Vipheak were sentenced. They appealed all the way to the Supreme Court, and in the interim, a draft press law was presented to the National Assembly for debate.
Under the draft law, defamation and libel were still considered criminal acts punishable by prison sentences.
The law also contained sweeping statements forbidding the publication of material that could affect national security or political stability, or humiliate “national institutions.”
On July 18, 1995, the Assembly approved the law after removing all references to prison sentences, though references to national security, political stability and national institutions remained.
However, Article 20, which was described by legal experts as a “stealth clause,” was included.
Article 20 states that “any act committed by an employer, editor or author of a text which violates the criminal law shall be punished according to the criminal law.”
Though the press law had come into effect by the time Yim Sokha’s and Hen Vipheak’s cases had reached the Supreme Court, the court upheld the municipal court’s ruling under UNTAC law. Legal experts say that decision paved the way for future defamation cases to sidestep the press law and be treated as criminal cases.
Over the past 10 years, almost all charges against journalists have been brought under the UNTAC law, which is entirely legal because of Article 20.
Reporters Without Borders last week released a report ranking the state of Cambodia’s press freedom higher than that of all of its neighbors, and even than India’s.
But an official with the organization admitted that Cambodia’s relatively high ranking was awarded before Mam Sonando’s arrest, adding that recent events would affect next year’s ranking.
Khieu Kanharith said times have changed since Yim Sokha and Hen Vipheak were charged and imprisoned in 1995.
Ultimately the court will decide what will happen to Mam Sonando, Khieu Kanharith said, adding that he doesn’t expect the radio broadcaster to be treated the same way as the two previously jailed journalists.
“The context is quite different,” he said.
“Today’s journalists are better. And the government accepts criticism better than before.”