Several judges and prosecutors aged 60 years and over have been working without pay for the past four months after the government reportedly took them off the payroll as part of a plan to retire them, justice officials said on Monday.
It was unclear whether all 31 court officials identified by government documents as being slated for retirement throughout the course of the year have been affected, but two prosecutors contacted said they still haven’t been notified as to why their payment has been stopped.
“I have not received my salary since May,” said Huot Hy, 66, Kompong Thom Provincial Court chief prosecutor. “The lack of payment is going on without notice,” he said.
When the problem first came to light in June, Justice Minister Ang Vong Vathana blamed a computer error and the affected court officials, except Appeals Court Prosecutor-General Hanrot Raken, continued attending work. Hanrot Raken left his position in May.
Huot Hy and Chheng Phat, 70, Kandal Provincial Court chief prosecutor, said Tuesday that reports surfaced in June stating that the missing salaries would be reimbursed the following month but that did not happen.
Documents obtained earlier this year indicated the government planned to retire 31 judges and prosecutors as part of the CPP’s deal with Funcinpec to end last year’s political gridlock.
While most civil servants are required to retire at the age of 60, no law states when judges and prosecutors must retire.
According to a document signed by Sim Rithisen, director of the Justice Ministry’s personnel department, on Aug 27, 2004, some of the 31 judges and prosecutors were to be forcibly retired every quarter through 2005.
Tuot Lux, Justice Ministry secretary of state, said he did not know if the judges and prosecutors would be reimbursed their missing pay packets, but said his ministry and the Supreme Council of Magistracy are working on a new decree that will require that they retire.
“We are waiting for a Royal Decree to place them in retirement,” Tuot Lux said. “We have been waiting for the statute for too long.”

