SRP-CCHR Conflict Spills Into Cyberspace

The spat between the Sam Rain­sy Party and Kem Sokha’s Cambo­dian Center for Human Rights took to cy­berspace over the weekend, with sev­eral Khmers living abroad de­­nouncing the SRP’s boycott of CCHR forums.

In one online discussion group, mainly serving Cambodians living in the US, participants questioned the quarrel between Sam Rainsy and Kem Sokha, the leaders of the two once-kindred groups, and wondered why it had started.

The discussion group was re­sponding to an e-mail from Sam Rain­sy announcing that all SRP members would boycott all CCHR public forums unless CCHR leader Kem Sokha ceased his “repeated at­­tacks” on the party.

“In my view, this statement has a ser­ious negative implication on the [SRP] party, as it carries dictatorial re­s­­­onance and attitude,” wrote Bora Touch, a discussion group mem­ber, in an email dated Sunday.

“Why couldn’t SRP work with Kem Sokha? Talk to him—same way you talked to Hun Sen, find the com­mon ground and work together to­wards a common goal. Please re­member that everyone has political am­bitions,” responded Saunora Pro­m on the same day.

Mrith Chhang, who attended a meeting on Saturday held by Kem Sok­­ha in Seattle in the US state of Wash­ington, wrote that both sides in the simmering disagreement stood to lose support if they could not come to an agreement.

“It is assumed that if the conflict continues and cannot be resolved, both will see losses of support in the near future, and democracy in Cam­bo­dia will be at risk,” he wrote.

Sam Rainsy was in Paris and could not be reached for comment. SRP law­maker Son Chhay said that for such mes­sages to traded among Cam­bo­dians overseas was normal during any political development.

Kem Sokha, who is touring in the US until after the Khmer New Year, had re­ported hearing opinions similar to those ex­pressed in the e-mails during his visit, said CCHR spokes­man Ou Vi­r­ak, add­ing that he himself was not aware of the e-mail de­bate.

 

Related Stories

Latest News