Public Forum Debates Virtues, Vices of WTO

Experts and government officials weighed the virtues and dangers of globalization during the first day of a public forum on Cam­bodia’s effort to join the World Trade Organization.

Suos Someth, Cambodia’s permanent representative to the WTO and UN agencies in Gene­va, sounded an optimistic early note by commending Cambo­dia’s 100-member team charged with laying the groundwork for joining the WTO, which promises freer access to world markets in exchange for lowered tariffs and pro-trade policies.

“No longer asked are questions on the usual turbulent past political history of the killing fields and fighting. We have helped to close that grim chapter,” he said.

Suos Someth said that trade would stimulate growth, but only if the government “promote[d] foreign and domestic investments, for which predictability and good governance practice are imperative.”

The WTO would support “a gradual liberalization allowing countries time to make the necessary adjustments and take contingency actions against imports that are particularly damaging,” Sous Someth added.

But Ministry of Economy and Fi­nance official Uy Sambath said WTO officials had already asked Cambodia to lower its import taxes. “That we cannot afford,” he said, because import taxes constitute 73 percent of Cambodia’s tax rev­enue.

Cambodian tariff rates, at an average at 29 percent, are already low compared to other least-de­veloped countries and it cannot af­ford to go lower, he said.

Other speakers warned that the WTO is biased toward the richer countries.

“The WTO expects national governments to review domestic legislation…if it turns out to be ‘barriers’ to liberalized trade,” said Norbert von Hofmann of the Ger­man development foundation Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. “But on the other side the WTO is not willing to discuss workers’ rights and the impact of trade liberalization on sections of the population in need of protection.”

Charles Santiago, a Malaysia-based trade consultant, charged that “the interests of the WTO are on a collision course with those of developing and less developed countries.”

Developed countries use the WTO to make hypocritical de­mands, Santi­ago said. The US and Europe are pres­sing developed countries to low­er tariffs on farm goods while subsidizing their own farmers, he said.

Farms in richer countries have huge advantages due to their size and access to better resources and technology, he said. Dairy cows in the US produce more than 90 liters of milk a day, while Cambodian cows typically produce less than 10 liters, he said.

“The developed countries are clearly using trade rules and agreements to suffocate or control production by the developing world’s producers,” he said.


Related Stories

Latest News

The Weekly DispatchA new weekly newsletter from The Cambodia Daily delivering news, analysis and opinion to your inbox. Published every Friday at 11:30am. Sign up today.